Quantcast
Channel: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 21 View Live

You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

Part 1 here: http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/18742/You-replace-Fisher-as-First-Sea-Lord In a shocking alteration of events it is YOU who becomes the First Sea Lord of the Royal Navy in...

View Article



Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

bennett0 wrote:Coast artillery in general was significantly more accurate than naval gunfire.  First, coast artillery tubes were stationary and only the target was moving.  With naval gunfire both...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88 wrote:those CLs...were part of the BCF screen...vanguard to have the same speed as the GF since they need to keep ahead at a fixed distance, 30mn IIRC this time....ow supposedly the dreads high...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88 wrote:...the ability to close on contacts, even if it is just a couple Km...the GF's front covered several Km since it steamed formed in several columns...The first sub line is a trip wire so...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88 wrote:That you are trying to extrapolate an example that has nothing in common with the current scenario (range, target armour, gun performance), but you still seem to fail to grasp that fact....

View Article


Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88 wrote:the RN...needs to keep a constant presence in order to ambush the HSF whenever it decides to come out.  No, because the RN does have to worry about reducing the HSF numbers, it sits in a...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

ChrisPat wrote:JAG88 wrote:those CLs...were part of the BCF screen...vanguard to have the same speed as the GF since they need to keep ahead at a fixed distance, 30mn IIRC this time....ow supposedly...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

ChrisPat wrote:JAG88 wrote:...the ability to close on contacts, even if it is just a couple Km...the GF's front covered several Km since it steamed formed in several columns...The first sub line is a...

View Article


Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88Sir,I was simply asking a question.  How fast a ship is going at the time it is torpedoed is important.  It's theoretical top speed is not.  Your response, less the sarcasm and hostility, gives a...

View Article


Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

ChrisPat wrote:Bennett, have some patience, there's a well rooted pet idea being tested to destruction here.Yeah, it is called "a 9" gun can one-shot a GK"!  But dont let reality get in the way...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

ChrisPat wrote:JAG88 wrote:That you are trying to extrapolate an example that has nothing in common with the current scenario (range, target armour, gun performance), but you still seem to fail to...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

bennett0 wrote:JAG88Sir,I was simply asking a question.  How fast a ship is going at the time it is torpedoed is important.  It's theoretical top speed is not.  Your response, less the sarcasm and...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

You might try actually reading what people post.  Who knows, that might just allow you to learn something once in a while.  Unfortunately I suspect, based on your previous posts, that's probably too...

View Article


Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

ChrisPat wrote:JAG88 wrote:the RN...needs to keep a constant presence in order to ambush the HSF whenever it decides to come out.  No, because the RN does have to worry about reducing the HSF numbers,...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

bennett0 wrote:You might try actually reading what people post.  Who knows, that might just allow you to learn something once in a while.  Unfortunately I suspect, based on your previous posts, that's...

View Article


Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88 wrote:Really? That is the "problem"? Then why didnt you say so instead of mentioning the torpedo range and that only one sub got a shot?  Clearly you didnt think it through and are just trying...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88 wrote:You are aware of this thing called coal right?  Supposedly it generates large quantities of smoke when ignited, masts is not what I am looking for, large quantities of smoke from numerous...

View Article


Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88 wrote:Again, and again, and again... whos gonna close to that range?  As Bennett and I have said, coastal guns were much more accurate than naval ones.  You have to close to 18,100m, because...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

JAG88 wrote:Comfortable superiority? Go read what Jellicoe thought of this "comfortable superiority" in 1914.  The nerve!  And that is without counting the ships you sayThat'll be why unsinkable...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

If questioning wild statements about the absolute and total superiority of German (both HSF and KM) ships, seamen and leaders made by a tiny group of Germans/Germanophiles makes me a troll, then I...

View Article

Re: You replace Fisher Part 2 (1910-1914)

For the HSF;Subs on leaving and returning.  It seems their precautions worked.Mines leaving and returning.  It seems their precautions usually worked.Subs on approaching and leaving the English coast....

View Article

Browsing latest articles
Browse All 21 View Live




Latest Images